Sarah Palin: Spreading the Wealth

The McCain campaign has repeatedly called Obama a socialist, using against him the words, “spread the wealth around”. It’s kind of hard to blame them, at this point; desperate times call for desperate measures, I suppose. They’re losing badly and don’t seem to have any real plans of their own to promote, so the best they can hope for is to scare voters with threats of socialism or communism under an Obama administration.

At a rally in Des Moines, Sarah Palin says the following:

See, under a big government, more tax agenda, what you thought was yours would really start belonging to somebody else, to everybody else. If you thought your income, your property, your inventory, your investments were, were yours, they would really collectively belong to everybody. Higher taxes, more government, misusing the power to tax leads to government moving into the role of some believing that government then has to take care of us. And government kind of moving into the role as the other half of our family, making decisions for us. Now, they do this in other countries where the people are not free.

MSNBC – Keith Olbermann

Olbermann responds:

So Gov., Obama’s not just a socialist? Not just a re-distributionist re-distributor? Maybe not just a totalitarian? Maybe not just a dictator, he may be a communist?

To paraphrase you in Des Moines, Governor, Obama wants to set up, unlike other candidates, collectively owning the resources. By sharing that wealth and those resources. Collectivist sharing’ the wealth socialist communism, I’d say.

But wait! There’s more!

Sarah Palin, who has lately taken to calling Obama “Barack the Wealth Spreader,” seems to be something of a suspect character herself. She is, at the very least, a fellow-traveller of what might be called socialism with an Alaskan face. The state that she governs has no income or sales tax. Instead, it imposes huge levies on the oil companies that lease its oil fields. The proceeds finance the government’s activities and enable it to issue a four-figure annual check to every man, woman, and child in the state. One of the reasons Palin has been a popular governor is that she added an extra twelve hundred dollars to this year’s check, bringing the per-person total to $3,269. A few weeks before she was nominated for Vice-President, she told a visiting journalist—Philip Gourevitch, of this magazine—that “we’re set up, unlike other states in the union, where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs.”

[emphasis mine]

The New Yorker Magazine – Hendrik Hertzberg

I’d respond to this myself, but Keith Olbermann did it so well:

Who was the collectivist share-the-wealther, who was boasting to the reporter visiting from “The New Yorker Magazine,”of having been able to send a check for $1,200 to every man, woman and child in the state since, quote “Alaska is sometimes described as America’s socialist state, because of its collective ownership of resources?”

Why, you said that, Governor! You’re a share-the-wealth, collectivist, Almost-Socialist-Governor, Governor! Who also believes that income, property, inventory and investments, collectively belonging to everybody else, leads to a misuse of power, and government making decisions for us, turning countries into places where the people are not free.

Places like, Sarah Palin’s America! Governor, all sorts of choice words apply here: hypocrite, double-talker, snake-oil seller, socialist. But let me stick with just one, with which to bid you goodbye. You, governor, are a fraud.

I think that pretty much sums it up!

6 responses to “Sarah Palin: Spreading the Wealth

  • thehun

    Great post.

    You know, I find it astounding how McCain/Palin supporters will believe any misconception, slander and lie that is uttered by their candidates or is forwarded to their inboxes.

    They do not know what socialism means. They don’t understand that for most of them the wealth is already being spread from them to the wealthiest people in the country. That Obama’s plan is not socialism and would in fact reverse the Republican “wealth spreading” to the top.

    All they “know” is that socialism is a dirty word and it is (somehow) embodied in Obama (along with traitor, terrorist, Muslim, etc.) because their candidate said so.

    They do not have the intellectual curiosity to find the facts which you have pointed out. (This lack of intellectual curiosity is what they have in common with the likes of Bush and Palin, and I submit that it is the main reason they support such people)

    Even when presented with the facts as you have laid them out, the reaction is to gloss over them, dismiss them, or change the subject to some other reason Obama is the most horrible person in the whole wide world.

    This is just like the Bridge to Nowhere that she supported and sent lobbyists to Washington to arrange before it went to crap.

    Just like the natural gas pipline ( she loves to tout, in which she was involved in the same type of cronyism she claims to be against. A plan that also ended up costing Alaskans, from the article:

    “Under a different set of rules four years earlier, TransCanada had offered to build the pipeline without a state subsidy; under Palin, the company could receive a maximum $500 million.”

    But hey, that doesn’t matter because she sold that plane on eBay… even though she didn’t… how mavericky!

    Like most Republicans, she is everything that she claims to be against.

    But her supporters will never see or accept it. Well most won’t, hopefully some will wake up and say “Damn this Kool-Aid sucks!”

    Damn… I typed a lot of stuff.

  • Lottie

    Damn… I typed a lot of stuff.

    A lot of damn good stuff!

    Thanks for taking the time and for your awesome contribution!

  • thehun

    Thanks for clarifying the “goodness” of the stuff I typed. Glad it turned out to be a contribution vs. jibber jabber. 😉 (but i guess it can be both)

    Once I get that far I often wonder about what the heck it was I just said and lack the wherewithal to re-read it to be sure.


  • Lottie

    I didn’t detect a bit of jibber jabber. But even so…

    (but i guess it can be both)

    … I certainly hope so, considering the title of my blog. 😆

  • Lottie

    Thank you so much! I heard about this last night and was so hoping to find a link to something about it.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

%d bloggers like this: